If you've read our entry on the "About Us" page, you know that one impetus in our creation is our
resistance to the trend in recent decades for Conservatives and Republicans to stand by tacitly
while the opposition dictates and defines the terms of political discourse. No more.
We're defining the terms now.
Toward that end we'll examine a few words and phrases in each issue.

FASCISM:  term was first used by Italian dictator Mussolini in 1919. It exalts  nation , race or ethnicity
above individual rights and freedoms and stands for a strong autocratic centralized government led by a
dictatorial leader severe economic and social regimentation and forcible suppression of opposition,
often marked by aggressive and brutal military actions.

SOCIALISM: economic and social system under which essential industries and social services are
publicly and cooperatively owned and democratically controlled with a view to equal opportunity and
equal benefit for all, seeking to establish a Utopian society.

COMMUNISM: a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in
common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.;  a system of
social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated
by a single and self-perpetuating political party,  a theory and system of social and political organization
that was a major force in world politics for much of the 20th century that sought to overthrow capitalism.

AUTHORITARIANISM: strict and demanding obedience,  favoring strict rules and established authority;  
demanding political obedience: belonging to or believing in a political system in which obedience to the
ruling person or group is strongly enforced.

TOTALITARIANISM: in political science, system of government and ideology in which all social, political,
economic, intellectual, cultural, and spiritual activities are subordinated to the purposes of the rulers of a
state. In modern totalitarianism, however, people are made utterly dependent on the wishes and whims
of a political party and its leaders. It is marked by the creation of an elite ruling class and the total
control of media and communication and total control of all economic and commercial enterprises.

GLOBALISM: A national geopolitical policy in which the entire world is regarded as the appropriate
sphere for a state's influence, a movement toward the strengthening of the scope and power of world
geopolitical and economic organizations and entities.

OBAMAISM: a political ideology established by President Barack Obama in 21st century America. A
form of totalitarianism, it is also a hybrid, selecting and rejecting components of other theories. Under
Obamaism, as many as possible aspects of life are brought under government control, Administration
attitudes on social, cultural and religious matters are forced upon the people, and free enterprise id
supplanted by government controlled businesses and financial institutions. Obamaism is authoritarian in
that it is built around one, all-powerful leader. Although it does share with FASCISM the tendency to
suppress opposition, Obamasim is based in extreme globalism, viewing the USA only as a small
component in a global government. International military force is therefore considered counterproductive
to world governmental development and is avoided as completely as possible, with the use of military
force being reserved to achieve domestic order. Although using some of the vernacular of Socialism and
Communism, Obamaism does not seek equal distribution of wealth and services but distribution to
favored groups and the punishment of others.



COOL: DEFINITION: A CONSERVATIVE..
Notes from the
Conservative's
Lexicon
Hosting by Yahoo! Web Hosting
[ Yahoo! ] options
MANDATE: Usually defined as an order or command in the realm of politics it denotes an election victory
that was not only a landslide but so attributable to one identifiable and significant factor that landslide
can in no way be quantified as a landslide. Secondly, there is no one single stand of Obama's on any
campaign was so complex that it contained both pro and con stands on everything from war to abortion.  
What resulted were Obama voters who voter in some blissful haze of hope but could rarely identify an
issue-based reason. A lot can emerge from a situation like that but a MANDATE isn't one of them.

SACRIFICE: Used by most of us to indicate giving up something we need or want for an altruistic
purpose. It happens to be an Obama favorite. We are being told with growing frequency that there will
be much sacrifice for us. Remember that our new President is master at language manipulation. When
he says "sacrifice", which definition is he using. The dictionary primarily talks about a sacrifice as
something offered to a deity or higher power. Something that is killed on an altar or something that is
destroyed or surrendered for the sake of something else. What is striking about these definitions is that
they do not necessarily involve the approval or cooperation of the person who sacrifices or is sacrificed.
Do not assume that Obama means a gentle sacrifice of gas usage or something. Couldn't he just as
easily be talking about the destruction of free enterprise and the surrender of individual rights to
produce the welfare state he envisions?

Cool: Definition: A Conservative.
entertainment. Whether it is a mindless sitcom or an edifying historical special, it is entertainment. It is a
product. On the radio music is a product; talk outside of a newscast is a product. Unless it violates a
criminal law, broadcasters have the right to sell it. People have the right to buy it. And make no mistake,
when you watch or listen, you subject yourself to advertising and the entertainment content then equal
portions of liberal-influenced entertainment than to force us all to drink more Coke to balance
consumption of Pepsi. For the governmental to so directly and forcibly control what we choose to hear
and see is nothing short of a  totalitarian tyranny that would draw praise from Lenin and Marx. Our first
step to fight this is to reject their terminology! Insist this policy be called what it is: The Doctrine to End a
Consumer's Rights in Media Choice. However, because that is too lengthy, we'll subscribe to the new
terminology of
THE CENSORSHIP DOCTRINE, as endorsed by Sean Hannity, although "censorship" is
mild in describing such oppression.

VOTER SUPPRESSION: The Liberal/Dems have made great efforts to redefine the term "voter
suppression" as any questioning of, or opposition to voter fraud and illegal registrations. This is
outrageous and we must fight these efforts to redefine this phrase for they will only intensify. ACORN
and the like must be very emboldened by the success they had in manipulating election outcomes. They
will be doing more and more in the way of registering unqualified and fictional people, lobbying for a
relaxation of any law or regulation restricting voting, and entrenching people that share their view in
positions of election authority nationwide. Fighting that is NOT suppression. It is protecting the sanctity
of each legal vote and the system, itself.
Labor Union leaders that use intimidation to try to prevent members from voting for Republican
candidates- now THAT is an example of what voter suppression really is. The Networks announcing on
Election Night that the election is over- that there is no hope for a Republican victory even though there
are many western states and millions of voters yet to vote- now, THAT IS VOTER SUPPRESSION on a
big scale!

BIPARTISAN: The standard definition of this is relating to or supported by two bodies, usually two
political parties. Although Democrats may contend that they observe that denotation, their actions reveal
their real operating definition. When they say "Bipartisan", they mean: "You Republicans may participate
in what we are doing, but you may not question, oppose or even suggest." If a Republican should ever
have the unmitigated gall to question, oppose or even suggest a change to any administration cause,
bill or initiative, then  the Republicans will be deprived of the warm and fuzzy handle of "Bipartisan" and
will then be labeled as using selfish and obstructive "partisanship". When you hear a Dem or a RINO
using the term "Bipartisan", be afraid. Be very afraid.

Cool: Definition: A Conservative.
balanced treatment of opposing candidates in elections. That, actually, is only holding those who claim
entertainment. Whether it is a mindless sitcom or an edifying historical special, it is entertainment. It is a
when you watch or listen, you subject yourself to advertising and the entertainment content then
becomes a product. The liberal/Democrat controlled government has no more right to force us to buy
equal portions of liberal-influenced entertainment than to force us all to drink more Coke to balance
consumption of Pepsi. For the governmental to so directly and forcibly control what we choose to hear
and see is nothing short of a  totalitarian tyranny that would draw praise from Lenin and Marx. Our first
step to fight this is to reject their terminology! Insist this policy be called what it is: The Doctrine to End a
Consumer's Rights in Media Choice. However, because that is too lengthy, we'll subscribe to the new
terminology of
THE CENSORSHIP DOCTRINE, as endorsed by Sean Hannity, although "censorship" is
mild in describing such oppression.

VOTER SUPPRESSION: The Liberal/Dems have made great efforts to redefine the term "voter
suppression" as any questioning of, or opposition to voter fraud and illegal registrations. This is
outrageous and we must fight these efforts to redefine this phrase for they will only intensify. ACORN
and the like must be very emboldened by the success they had in manipulating election outcomes. They
will be doing more and more in the way of registering unqualified and fictional people, lobbying for a
relaxation of any law or regulation restricting voting, and entrenching people that share their view in
positions of election authority nationwide. Fighting that is NOT suppression. It is protecting the sanctity
of each legal vote and the system, itself.
Labor Union leaders that use intimidation to try to prevent members from voting for Republican
candidates- now THAT is an example of what voter suppression really is. The Networks announcing on
Election Night that the election is over- that there is no hope for a Republican victory even though there
are many western states and millions of voters yet to vote- now, THAT IS VOTER SUPPRESSION on a
big scale!

BIPARTISAN: The standard definition of this is relating to or supported by two bodies, usually two
political parties. Although Democrats may contend that they observe that denotation, their actions
reveal their real operating definition. When they say "Bipartisan", they mean: "You Republicans may
participate in what we are doing, but you may not question, oppose or even suggest." If a Republican
should ever have the unmitigated gall to question, oppose or even suggest a change to any
administration cause, bill or initiative, then  the Republicans will be deprived of the warm and fuzzy
handle of "Bipartisan" and will then be labeled as using selfish and obstructive "partisanship". When you
hear a Dem or a RINO using the term "Bipartisan", be afraid. Be very afraid.

Cool: Definition: A Conservative.
Hosting by Yahoo! Web Hosting
Copyright © 2009 The Cool Conservative All Rights Reserved.
the American people. The older major networks, most of the older newspapers, the wire services and
driven by a prepackaged liberal, political agenda that is anything but mainstream.
The preferred term
close-minded and irrelevant.
connection with John McCain as if it were the most repugnant of slurs. There are evil lobbyists, there are
also good lobbyists- people who work for worthy causes or who legitimately seek legislative help for a
representing his favorite causes such as Planned Parenthood. He promised to allow the nation's
community organizations to meet with him to tell him what they want his agenda to be. That would make
them all lobbyists!

A term that liberals love to bandy about is
"WOMAN'S REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS". How
genteel-sounding, yet how completely bogus. Liberals established this term and have foisted it upon our
society to provide cover for a variety of activities ranging from facilitating sexual activity for a minor child
to killing an infant that survived an abortion... No longer will we tolerate the use of this term..

Reproductive Rights? Yes, a woman in America does have the right to reproduce (no matter how
ill-advised that may be). As long as she and the father meet legal requirements of age, relationship and
sanity-Yes, indeedie, she has the right to reproduce. However, once she does reproduce, that is to say
that biologically, the egg and sperm have conjoined thereby producing an offspring, Then, at that point
the woman has fulfilled her right to reproduce. Her "reproductive rights" then become totally moot and
cease to exist. Her reproductive rights are supplanted by the rights of the child. Like others in our
society too young, too old, too injured or too infirm to care for themselves, this child has the right to
care, to protection and to survival.

The correct term: "A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO REPRODUCE"- no more, no less. Do not allow others to
hide behind the use of "woman's reproductive rights". It is false and ambiguous.

A recommended spelling change: NewsWEEK magazine is clearly in error. It should be NewsWEAK.

COOL. Definition: A Conservative.